Robert’s Rules of Order

Written by Menno Treffers

Brilliant and Problematic

Robert’s Rules of Order is a guide for conducting meetings and making decisions as a group.

Robert’s Rules of Order are brilliant. Everyone with experience in chairing meetings of a clubs, boards, and parliaments will appreciate the thought that went into covering all possible situations that a chair may encounter.

Robert’s Rules of Order are also problematic. The terminology is arcane and the complexity can be misused to disenfranchise participants that are less familiar with the rules.

Arcane terminology

The use of “move a motion” instead of “propose a decision”, for example. And “table a motion” instead of “postpone the decision”. It is hard to use the correct terms for motions and procedures unless you regularly use Robert’s Rules of Order.


My edition of Robert’s Rules of Order has 704 pages. There are simplified versions but even these are intimidating.

The complexity creates an advantage for people who are more familiar with the rules. They can block proposals and ideas they don’t like by making procedural motions and objections that cannot be countered by inexperienced participants or an inexperienced chair.

Playing procedural games is a useful from of education in the meeting of a student club, but gets in the way when a group needs to make decisions fairly and efficiently.

Unsuitable for international groups

Everyone who is new to Robert’s Rules of Order, and participants who are not native English speakers in particular, will have difficulty contributing to the discussion and will certainly be unable to chair meetings under these rules. That makes Robert’s Rules of Order unsuitable for international groups.


I am not aware of alternative rules of order that are written down as comprehensively.

In practice, a less formal interaction between participants in alliance meeting works fine. The behavior of the chair becomes more critical to the success of such a meeting. With Robert’s Rules of Order, the chair’s actions are guided by the Rules. In a less formal meeting, the chair needs to be more pro-active in making sure that all participants get the opportunity to speak, and that decisions are made fairly and understood by everyone.


You may also like…

Why Startups Fail

Why Startups Fail

Review of the book “Why Startups Fail” by Thomas Eisenmann. Data from Eisenmann’s survey suggests that lack of proprietary intellectual property plays a role in the failure of startups. Survival is harder when IPR doesn’t protect the first-to-market advantage.

Chairing an Industry Alliance Meeting

Chairing an Industry Alliance Meeting

Meetings of industry alliances are about getting decisions made. It is the responsibility of the chair to organize the decision-making process. The chair is a facilitator, not the decision-maker.

Organizing Successful Meetings

Organizing Successful Meetings

A multi-day meeting of an international group needs meeting rooms, web meeting facilities, audio conferencing facilities, catering, and nearby hotels and restaurants.


Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *