What is the RAND royalty rate for a single essential patent?

Written by Menno Treffers

Assigning value to individual essential patents.

How would you split the royalty income between the owners of patents that are essential for using a standard?

Let’s assume for the moment that the patent owners and the users of the standard have agreed on a combined RAND royalty rate for the use of all essential patents. What is a reasonable royalty rate for 10% of these essential patents, or for a single essential patent? 

You could simply charge 10% of the RAND rate for all essential patents, but that assumes all essential patents are equal. There are, however, good reasons to differentiate between the value of individual essential patents:

  • An essential patent may be found invalid when challenged.
  • Some products may not infringe all essential patents.
  • Detection of infringement may not be feasible in practice for all essential patents.

Only patents that are valid and infringed will generate sustainable license income. The other essential patents play a marginal role. Manufacturers of products will want a license to reduce the risk of future claims, but they will pay far more for patents that have survived a validity challenge and are obviously infringed by the manufacturer’s products.

In an article on IPWatchdog.com, I compare different methods that have been tried to determine the RAND royalty rate for a subset of all essential patents, and suggest a method that is based on each patent’s contribution to generating license income.

Read more: “The Royalty Rate for a Subset of Standard Essential Patents – What Is Reasonable?

For a discussion on the RAND royalty rate for the use of all essential patents see: “A micro-economic estimate of the reasonable royalty rate for standard essential patents.

You may also like…

Why Startups Fail

Why Startups Fail

Review of the book “Why Startups Fail” by Thomas Eisenmann. Data from Eisenmann’s survey suggests that lack of proprietary intellectual property plays a role in the failure of startups. Survival is harder when IPR doesn’t protect the first-to-market advantage.

Can patent owners block the use of a standard?

Can patent owners block the use of a standard?

Developers of standards don’t like it when a patent owner blocks the use of their standard. The considerable effort that goes into developing a standard, typically hundreds of man-years, is wasted when that standard is not used.

0 Comments