The Psychology of Meeting Rooms

Meeting room layout in U-shape

Written by Menno Treffers

Category: Meeting Management

2022-01-09

Seating Arrangements Matter

The layout of a meeting room determines how participants interact and how they understand the role of the person chairing the meeting.

Are the participants facing each other?
Or are the partcipants facing a speaker behind a lectern?
The layout of a meeting room determines how participants interact and how they understand the role of the person chairing the meeting. The general rules for interaction are:
  • More interaction and discussion between participants when they can look each other in the face.
  • More interaction and discussion when participants are close together.
  • Participants are more passive when they are further apart and cannot see each other’s face.
The general rules for position of the person chairing the meeting are:
  • Chair is on the podium behind a lectern or table: emphasizes the authority of the chair and makes participants more passive.
  • Chair is one of the persons around the table:  emphasizes that the chair facilitates the meetings and makes the participants more active.

Layout variants for seating 60 participants

iOne possibility is to arrange the tables as a series of nested U-shapes. The inner U should not seat more than 25 persons. This maximizes the number of participants that will fit into the room such that the most active participants can see each other. The chair can sit at the side (position A) or in the center of the inner U (position B). I usually prefer position A because you can better see the people at the back of the room.
You can arrange the tables in a similar fashion when the meeting room is wide.  
The advantage of a single large U-shape is that all participants can see each other. The disadvantage is that they are very far apart. It is also a inefficient use of space. You will need a very large conference room to accommodate 60 participants.  
A “theatre” layout creates the perception of a lecture. I would use this only for series of presentations with a Q&A between speaker and audience. This layout is not ideal for getting participants to discuss amongst themselves.  

Further reading

The article “Organizing Successful Meetings” covers other aspects of meeting management.

The “Guide to chairing an industry alliance meeting” shows how the chair can make the meeting successful by getting decisions made efficiently. Choosing the right layout, and right seat in the room, is the chair’s responsibility.

You may also like…

RAND royalty rate setting – leave it to the market?

RAND royalty rate setting – leave it to the market?

Market forces can determine RAND royalty rates for standard essential patents such that (a) the standard is rapidly adopted, (b) royalty rates are accepted by the majority of users without need for litigation, and (c) royalty rates are transparent and non-discriminatory.

Guide for voting in meetings of industry groups

Guide for voting in meetings of industry groups

Guidelines for voting. How to make the most common voting procedures work, taking the unique requirements of industry alliances and consortiums into account. Simple yes/no voting, Voting on a series of options. Quorum, Confidentiality, and Tools.

Why Startups Fail

Why Startups Fail

Review of the book “Why Startups Fail” by Thomas Eisenmann. Data from Eisenmann’s survey suggests that lack of proprietary intellectual property plays a role in the failure of startups. Survival is harder when IPR doesn’t protect the first-to-market advantage.